This sounds great for a nice evening, doesn’t it?! I do like a good dark vintage…unless it’s on the dry side. Then I reach for the paler tones. I also seem to prefer a nice burgundy to over a bold red. Oh wait – I am distracted. Is this post about a good dessert and what vino I like to sip? Or about what colors I prefer to wear in different seasons? Well, both kind of – but I’ll pick the latter and make this about a wonderful wearable garment version of toffee and wine which I have made.
Sometimes I tire of wearing all the bright whites and pretty pastel colors during summer. It feels good to mellow out for a change with a combo of muted earth and rich jewel tones such as this outfit. Maybe I’m just trying to jump start myself into fall (when I usually wear such darker colors), or maybe I’m just being contrary. I don’t know. What I do know is that everything about this outfit feels good to me – from the cooling colors, to the texture and soft touch of the fabrics I used (rayon knits), to the easy relaxed fit, which actually makes me think I’m wearing Saturday sweats but looks like a nice weekday ‘going out’ set! These two pieces are up there as my favorite Burda makes, and I think will be among my most versatile.
To make this set even more appealing and enjoyable, it came together in a ridiculously small amount of time. Do you have a few hours on hand and a few small cuts of fabric? In that amount of time I whipped up this set so I can spend many hours to come enjoying the newest separates that I have made for my wardrobe from some random but lovely fabric I bought with no clear project in mind. Yes, you can have fashionable trousers that don’t require a zipper fly and need less than two yards of material. Yes, you can have a top that only has two major seams, and with only one yard of fabric look like a million. I’m sorry to advertise for these two patterns so much but I am really sold here. I’m so won over that in fact I’m tempted to whip up a few more pants and tops from these patterns, trying out new material and color choices. After all, these won’t take up that much time or fabric! I will definitely be on default reaching to wear these more often than not.
FABRICS: A striped rayon knit for the top, and a rayon/polyester blend Ponte Roma knit for the pants. A scrap of burgundy colored cling-free polyester lining was used for the inner pants pockets and top neckline facing.
PATTERNS: the “Shirt with Bat Sleeves” pattern #123A from April 2015 (also listed as “Boxy Top” #123B, also from April 2015) and the “Flounce Bottom Pants” pattern #117 from February 2018
TIME TO COMPLETE: The top was made in two hours and the pants were made in about 4 hours. Both were finished in the middle of June 2018.
THE INSIDES: The fabrics for both pieces do not have edges that ravel, so they are left loose and raw inside so they can stretch better anyway.
Perhaps you can see since I used the line drawing from the magazine instructions, but the top has the sleeves ‘built into’ the front so that the raglan seam in front is the only stitching line besides the side seams (and small bust darts). The back wraps over to the front. I was certainly glad for minimal seams with such a delicate fabric as rayon knit is, especially a ribbed version! ‘Chic’, to me, is effortless, amazing details that are low key but there to notice all the while. That is this top! Yet, it feels like a Saturday tee shirt to wear.
At first, the pants were something that I wasn’t sure if they would even work for me, as I have heard that shorter people don’t tend to work well with cropped hems if you want a silhouette that doesn’t take visual inches off your height. I just kept coming back to considering them, however, being intrigued by them, and I think the wide hem with its interesting detailing saves them for me. These should work for year-round wearing, as the shorter length should show off my boots that have interesting ankle decoration! I mostly love the fact that the “fly” front is different, interesting, and especially zipperless, as I had mentioned. I can deal with sewing on a few hooks and snaps, instead…no problem! The left side has a ‘normal’ centered front placket, but then the right side has a folded over section which extends over to the pleat on the other side of the waist. I might come back and put a snap in the asymmetric front fly just for complete confidence, but it really doesn’t open up so I’ve taken the easy road so far and just have closures on the waistband.
Now, as for any Burda Style pattern, printing and/or tracing is necessary to have a usable pattern to lay on your desired fabric. My patterns were traced from the inserts in the magazine issue, but they are also available online as a downloaded PDF that needs to be printed out and assembled together. What works best for me is to use a roll of thin, see-through medical paper to trace your pieces out. It’s at this preliminary step that you pick out your proper size. Some people add in your choice of seam allowance width directly to the pattern while some as they are cutting out the fabric pieces. A scissor with a magnetic ruler guide helps immensely to quicken along the step to getting a finished pattern prepped. Sorry to repeat something you might already know, but this is just an “FYI” for those that don’t.
Both patterns are rather straightforward and not too challenging to understand once you get into making them. However, the wide pattern pieces are a bit deceiving. The pants were an amazing fabric space-saver because they are divided up (with the wide cuffs) and cropped a shorter length than full pants. They were also almost entirely laid out on the straight grain. I only used 1 5/8 yards to have make these, leaving me with another 1 ½ yards leftover to make something else yet – yay! Of course I did shorten them because the sizing chart is designed for a woman 2 inches taller than me, so I took that much out of the body (leg) of the pants pattern. With the blouse it was a bit trickier to lay out on the fabric and adapt the design. In order to have the stripes miter into the seam I had to cut the front body with the fabric folded selvedge to selvedge, then open up and refold. The back/sleeve piece was long and unusual. It was cut with the fabric opened up and folded oppositely from the front to have the long, whole 60 inch width be the perfect, exact length for the hem end to front sleeve seam for my chosen size 34. Of course this layout was only really possible because on the pattern I shortened the top’s hem by a few inches and turned the sleeves into a short length. Any other size bigger or longer length sleeve would need about 1 ½ or maybe even 2 yards of fabric, then.
Sizing was really predictable and good for both patterns, too. With these pants, I cut in between sizes 36 and 40 to play it safe. For my black divided jumpsuit I sized down and they felt slightly snug while my navy Marlene trousers were kind of big going a size up. Going in between might be a bit unorthodox to many sewists but is perfect for me – apparently the sizing chart doesn’t lie. For the top, I wanted a closer fit and saw how roomy it appeared to run. It kind of has to be boxy and oversized when making it with a woven, because there is no closure of any kind – this is a pop-over top. However, as I wanted a closer fit and I was using a stretchy knit, I went a size down. Even still, I had to take the top in about 2 more inches on each side seam to get the still comfortably loose fit you see on my top.
The shirt’s facing is still non-stretchy (interfaced polyester lining) because something needs to support and keep the wonderful neckline shape in place! The neckline of my top turned out like a slanted-in square just like how I see the line drawing showing. However, the model’s garment in the picture looks to be more of a true square neckline. I like my top’s shaping better. I did cut off the self-facing to the center front panel and tape it in place to the curving facing for the rest of the neck so I ended up with one single piece. The facing does end up with a center front seam, but this way I knew I was getting the right shape for my super shifty fabric, and no extra seam in the corners made things simpler. I’m all about the K.I.S.S. principle (keep it simple, stupid!).
Talking about making things simple, I did leave the pants cuffs unhemmed and raw, so they end up a bit longer than planned, but it makes things easier for me and helps the pants looks better. I had managed to have no visible stitching on the rest of the pants, doing hand-picked stitching all along the waistband. I didn’t want to have to do more of that. Besides, I sense that a hem to the cuff flares would give them undue stiffness, and not have them hang so softly as they do for my version. Not too many fabrics can hold up to leaving a raw edge on a trouser hem like Ponte Roma can, though!
I only have a few caveats to these two patterns, and don’t take them to heart. I’ll warn you that these really have to do with my harsh pickiness with achieving the impossible – perfection – with what I make as well as my fabric choices. First, with the pants, I feel like the loose and poufy asymmetric front doesn’t do the best illusionary complimenting for my tummy. I self-consciously think I look fatter in these. I need the “Whatever!” attitude that my hubby has to that thought of mine. Also, the Ponte Roma makes sure that any panty line and any hem of whatever top I tuck in to my pants shows through from behind over the booty. Oh well! For the top, the neckline just makes it over my head. It’s rather funny because it gets caught on my nose. Most of the time this is a bother because I often fix my hair before I get dressed. Making the neckline more open even just ½ inch wider all around would I think help this little hang-up without changing the look very much. Next time!
Somehow, I was discreetly riding off of some vintage inspiration (no big surprise) for how I styled my outfit, but mostly for how to change up the air of the boxy top into something relaxed and shapely. You see, there is an old sewing pattern from the year 1935 for an easy one-yard striped top, and I could swear is the same as this Burda Style pattern. The back is again one piece with the sleeves, which similarly wrap around to the front for a raglan seam. Again, they use stripes which miter into the raglan seam. Who would have guessed?! I only found this cover image due to some random vintage sewing pattern searching and my weirdly sharp photographic memory. It’s amazing to see how a whole new setting can change the way we see a garment design. This might explain why I felt confident in softening the “Boxy Top” pattern so something very opposite of its name, and why I went and shortened the sleeves. Thus, my goal was to aim for a slightly modern 30’s influence, with the wide legged trousers which I made, the long necklace, the faux bobbed hair, an old 1960s era Biba Art Deco scarf at the waist, and vintage influenced Re-Mix brand sandals.
Even for my most modern outfits, vintage accessories or at least past inspiration can be found imbedded in there somewhere. I don’t think that the same situation is that far off for many couture and designer offerings today, as well. Personal interpretation of past fashion is the glory of what we have today, especially for those of us who sew. Individual expression in what we wear will be the saving grace from the enslavement of boring, unfitted fast fashions.
So – if my normal fall season colors sound good in the middle of summer…I’m doing it. If I can’t make a modern outfit without looking for where it originated, all the better. Knowledge is power. The desire for self-expression is strong and the world of today offers many avenues for that, but the silent yet deafening message of fashion is still so underrated today, in my opinion. This outfit only needed a few hours of my time and few yards of fabric to send my newest message of current inspiration and personal tastes. I’ll go mellow out to some wine now. Anyone up for dessert?