Early fall or late summer is a lovely season to me where I live. It has warm days, which I like, in between cold snaps that preview the next season to come. Together with the richness of colors building in the trees, interesting smells in the air, and enjoyable holidays on their way (familial birthdays, Thanksgiving, and Halloween), I really do wish I could hold on to this season for longer than it lasts, and not just because I despise winter.
My newest vintage 1930s sewing project, featured here, is I feel a perfect transition garment which takes into account all that I love about late summer and early fall. Stripes the golden color of wheat as well as fluffy clouds in the sky are on an earthy, textured linen dress, which has a fascinating use of the bias grain line. Vintage accessories from my Grandmother – gloves, earrings, necklace, and a brooch of double wheat sheaves – together with my Jeffrey Campbell leather lace-up shoes, a silk scarf, and a hat I refashioned to be an accurate 30’s shape all are meant to play with the richer colors of the fall season and thus bring out the muted stripes which highlight the amazing design of this dress pattern.
This was actually my outfit for our recent trip to Chicago, Illinois. Yes, I traveled and explored the busy city downtown in fully accessorized vintage style and loved it! And just think…this dress is linen too! What I discovered from the compliments I received from passer-bys is that apparently this dress is a transition piece in another way. It is not glaringly vintage, yet still completely true to year 1933. That is a trademark of a truly classic, lovely design! It is interesting enough in design that (especially made in striped fabric) it doesn’t scream for attention yet certainly can turn interested heads…almost like a toned down Wallis Simpson fashion for the modern vintage aesthetic. It is also simple enough in silhouette and sewing difficulty that it can be whipped up easily to suit many differing occasions depending on how one finishes or accessorizes. Case in point – this dress (before hemming) turned out very long on me and it looked very good with fancy jewelry and evening shoes…I can see a solid color satin or crepe ankle-length version of this dress making a wonderful elegant style! Oh no, another project idea in my future!
Sorry, I know you can’t see all of my dress’ neck and shoulder details with my scarf, but the dress really looks better for it…and Chicago is a city with a cool wind, indeed! Scarves were popularly worn like this in the 1930’s (see this article for more info and tips on using scarves) but they make such a great multi use fashion accessory in any era. I cannot do without a scarf more often than not. As for further clarification about my refashioned hat, it is modern, in straw, and something which I’ve had for years. It started out with the popular modern “bucket” style crown and I merely pinched it in from the inside at the center top so it would have a proper vintage shallow crown with a very 1930s style ridge down the center. The excess crown inside is folded flat and was hand stitched down in place. Easy-peasy and oh-so-handy, this hat is a great way to protect my face while complimenting my wardrobe using both something on hand and my penny-pinching capabilities!
FABRIC: slubbed, thick 100% linen
PATTERN: McCall’s #7153, a 2015 issue of a year 1933 design
NOTIONS: Nothing but thread and some interfacing was pretty much needed. A true vintage buckle was used to finish the belt as well as some stitch witchery bonding web.
TIME TO COMPLETE: This came together rather quickly – it was made in about 10 to 12 hours and finished on August 6, 2017
TOTAL COST: This fabric was bought when the now defunct Hancock Fabric’s was closing. This lovely linen was about $2 a yard…so I suppose this dress cost me about $6. How awesome is that!?
As someone who very frequently works with true vintage original sewing patterns of all decades in the 20th century, I can say I can recognize features of a vintage design and sort of estimate when something has been changed. As much as I do love my new dress and am generally impressed with this pattern, there are a few things I am not happy with and strike me as ‘off’.
First of all, there are small separate triangular panels which are sewn on at the true waist at the top of the side front skirt panels. This could have been on the original but I highly doubt it – there is no waistline seam to the similar side skirt panels in the back! For a long and lean bias 1933 dress like this one, why would this small panel be separate without an obvious purpose? A depression era pattern knew how to combine ingenuity and elegance in dressing with a complicated appearing simplicity and this small odd feature doesn’t strike me as ringing true to that habit. Either way I do not like it one bit. I should have just matched it to the top of the skirt side panels, taped it on there and cut the piece as one long part extending up to the bodice with no side seam.
The presence of the jarring, random horizontal waist seam remnant presents several ‘problems’ in my experience. It places too much importance on precise matching of the grain line and fabric print – if this small section is off it will be noticed. It mars the elegant and beautiful stripe work to the dress if the belt is not “just-so” over the seam…and with normal living’s body movements, a garment will not stay “picture perfect” anyway! Besides, my true waist seems to be slightly higher naturally and a belt carrier wouldn’t help by keeping it down where it doesn’t want to stay. After all, year 1933 was still coming off of the 20’s ideology and that year’s dresses were rarely defining the waist with a modern, boring horizontal seam, instead frequently opting for a wide panel, side gathering, interesting paneling, or similar gently hinting methods. This ugly, tiny waist seam remnant needs to meld into the rest of the dress. I made the pattern ‘as-is’ so I could learn from it – did I ever! Please do my recommended change for your version…one little extra step will make your version of this dress so much better!
My beef about the waist seam aside, look at the lovely details to the rest of the front! The tiny stripes matched up pretty well, and all the seams matched up impeccably. This dress’ stripe paneling reminds me of something along the lines of two of my favorite American designers/dressmakers Elizabeth Hawes and Muriel King, both of whom I admire for their stunning mitering methods (among other things). Mitering, often understood as a woodworking term for right angled joints, was appropriated by dressmakers in circa 1934. Its earliest proponents outside of America were the French couturier Marcel Rochas and a young Balenciaga. (Info from the book Elegance in an Age of Crisis from FIT.) However, Elizabeth Hawes used a bulls-eye pattern on the bias in the middle of the torso for a 1936 dress, a method very similar to the styling of this McCall pattern. Not meaning to brag, but the tiny, muted color stripes of the linen I used for my dress also reminds me also of the subtlety of Balenciaga’s cotton 1938 dress. If I can sew for myself anything that I feel can “knock-off” the designers that both I and history admires, that’s a big win!
Not to divert from my glowing praise, but my second complaint with this vintage reprint pattern was actually the same fitting problem as their other year 1933 re-issue (McCall #7053). They both turn out to have a very droopy shoulder seam in their kimono sleeves, which makes me think it is something that McCall’s does to the patterns and not the patterns themselves. After all, their Archive patterns are not really re-prints…from my understanding they are new drafts off of images and/or line drawings of old patterns they had issued in the past. I have sewn using vintage original patterns from both 1931 and 1934, both of which have kimono-style sleeves, and neither of them have given me the same problems I have with the 1933 McCall’s Archive issues. However, it is an easy fix. I sewed the long kimono shoulder/sleeve seam about 2 inches further in from the original 5/8 seam allowance. That’s a lot, isn’t it! This dress was severely droopy. The sleeves are very open anyway so taking out some doesn’t make much of a difference. When I sewed the sleeve/shoulder seam in smaller I also straightened it out – originally it has a dramatic curve that I think does not work out at all. The weird puckering curve in the shoulder seam is a big, obvious turn-off on the model version of the envelope cover. Other than the drooping shoulders, I did find the body of the dress to fit pretty much true to the size chart for the bottom half, and slightly a size big for the top half.
Many 1930’s dresses have a very figure hugging bias which I’ve heard many women say won’t work for everybody. This one seems to have a bias grain just gentle enough for shaping yet not enough to be overly clingy. The best part about the bias in both the skirt and the bodice is there is no closure needed! That’s right – no zipper, buttons, hooks, or snaps. It’s just plain easy. I know the instructions show a center back zipper, but those can be hard to do on oneself and sometimes also hard to keep the top pull from sagging down. I believe McCall’s threw the back zipper in to ‘modernize’ the design. The dress stretches wider easily from the smart grain line layout so why a zipper?! I see how the zipper weirdly bubbles out and warps the loveliness of the bias on the back of the model’s dress on the pattern cover. “Keep things simple, silly” (to put it mildly) is an engineering principle that is worthwhile to remember when engineering clothing, too.
This McCall’s pattern is not the best re-issue of a vintage style, but it does make for a very nice dress, with designer touches that is highly underrated once you get past its “meh” cover and fitting issues. This is a good pattern I would recommend everyone to have on hand to try. Once you make one successful version, I believe you will use it again, as I plan on doing. Don’t let the sole sleeve version deter you – there are many types of sleeves that could be added to a short kimono style like this one. There are no closures needed and deceptively easy to sew. Do you need any more reason to try this one? Come on…I want to see many more inspiring versions from all of you talented and lovely bloggers out there!